Autogenetic changes of vegetation in the Ingul River Valley

Authors

  • D.S. VYNOKUROV

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14255/2308-9628/18.142/1

Keywords:

syndynamics, succession, communities, series, autogenesis, endogenetic changes.

Abstract

Autogenetic changes of ve getation in the Ingul River Valley have been investigated. We located 12 transverse ecological gradients among different climatic conditions. We analyzed features of the natural dynamics of vegetation in the Ingul River Valley based on its serial developme nt. We highlight 8 series of vegetation which are combined into 3 groups based on the type of humidification conditions xerosere, mesosere and hydrosere. The first one is the most widespread in the Ingul River Valley, its communities occupy 80% of the to tal area. In this group four pioneer stages were detected: on carbonates in the downstream of the river (lithosere), on silicates in the middle part of the river (lithosere), on sands (psammosere) and on loesses (xerogeosere). Each of them can be considere d as a separate alliance of vegetation Potentillo arenariae Linion czerniaevii (vegetation on limestone outcrops), Poo bulbosae Stipion graniticolae (vegetation on granitic outcrops), Festucion beckeri (psammophitic vegetation), Tanaceto millefolii Galat ellion villosae (true steppe vegetation)vegetation). Mesosere communities have less distribution (not more than 5% of total area). Two initial stages were detected: alluvial mesosere and hygrolithosere. The first one combines alluvial shrub vegetation of the Salicete a p urpureae class, that are common on the upper part of the river. The second one includes chasmophytic vegetation on the granitic outcrops of the Ukrainian crystal shield. Communities of hydrarch changes (hydrosere) are common along the riversides. These coenoses allocate 15% of the total area. They are represented by eutrophic hydrosere and halosere. Pioneer stage of the eutrophic hydrosere is a true aquatic vegetation of Lemnetea and Potametea classes. Halosere is represented by two pioneer stages com munities of Salicornietum prostratae and Crypsietum aculeatae.

References

ALEKSANDROVA V.D . ( Dynamic of vegetation . In: Field Geobotany , Vol. 3: 300 447. Mosco w Leningrad: Nauka (in

BORNETTE G., P UIJALON S. ( Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a re view. Aquat Sci .., 73 : 1 14. doi : 10.1007/s00027 010 0162 7

BRAUN B LANQUET J. (1951) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzuge der Ve getationskunde . 2. Aufl. Wien: Springer Verlag, 631 p.

CLEMENTS F.E. (1916) Plant succession. An analysis of the development of veget ation Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 512 p.

DANSEREAU P. (1957) Biogeography: an ecological perspective . New York: The Ronald Press Co, 394

DIDUKH Ya. P., S HELIAG S OSONKO Yu.R. (2003) Geobotanical zoning of Ukraine and adjusting terri tories. Ukr. Bot. J., 60 (1): 6 11 (in

GOSSELINK J.G., M ALTBY E. (1990). Wetland losses and gains . In: Wetlands: A Threatened Landscape : 296 322. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

HENNEKENS S.M. (2009). TURBOVEG for Windows. Version 2 . Wageningen: voor Bos en Natuur, 84 p.

JOHNSON E.A., M IYANISHI K. (2008). Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. Ecology Letters , 11 : 419 431. doi: 10.1111/j.1461 0248.2008.01173.x.

KRASOVA O.O. (2013). Mozh lyvosti syntaxonomichnyh rishen shchodo ka rbonatopetrofil no i roslynnosti Prychornomor ya. V vidkrytyi z yizd fitobiologiv Prychornomor ya 2013: proceedings of V Meeting of Phytobiologists of Prychornomor ya, Kherson, Ukraine, April 25, 2013 : 56 (in

KRASOVA O.O., S METANA M.H. (1999). Step pe vegetation of the Kobylna gully. Ukr. fitotsen. zb ., 12 13 (1 2):21-30 (in

LÜDI W. (1932). Die Methoden der Sukzessionsforschung in der Pflanzensoziologie. Handb. Biol. Arbeitsmethoden , 5 : 527 728.

MIRKIN B.M., N AUMOVA L.G. (2012). Modern s tate of the main concepts of the vegetation science Ufa: Gilem. 488 p. (in Russian)

MITSCH W.J., G OSSELINK J.G. (1986). Wetlands . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 539 p.

MOSYAKIN S.L., F EDORONCHUK M.M. (1999). Vascular plants of Ukraine. A nomenclatural c hecklist . Kiev, 345 p.

MOYSIYENKO I.I., S OLOMAKHA V.A., D RABYNIUK G.V., S OLOMAKHA T.D. (2005) Eco coenotic pecularities of Scutellaria verna Besser in conditions of the “Elanetskiy step” Nature Reserve (Mykolaiv region, Ukraine). Chornomorsk . bot. z ., 1 2): 83 91 (in

RAZUMOVSKIY S M . (1981). Zakonomernosti dinamiki biotsenozov . Moscow: Nauka, 231 p. (in Russian)

RICKLEFS R. E. (1990). Ecology , 3rd edn New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 896 p.

ROSLYNNIST URSR . Stepy, kam yanysti vidslonennia, pisky (1973). Barbarych A.I. (ed.). Kyiv: Nauko va dumka, 428 p. (in Ukrainian)

SHENNIKOV A.P. (1964). Vvedeniye v geobotaniku . Leni ngrad: LGU, 448 p. (in Russian)

SHIMWELL D.W. (1971). The description and classification of vegetation Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press, 322 p.

SUKACHEV V M ( Nekotoryye obshiye teoreticheskiye voprosy fitotsenologii . Voprosy botaniki 1 : 449-463 (in

TANSLEY A.G. (1939). The British Islands and their vegetation Cambridge: The University Pres s, 930 p.

TIKHOMIROVA A.L., R AZUMOVSKIY S.M. (1988). Osobennosti funktsionirovaniya suktsessionnyh sistem na Krainem Severe In: Biologia pochv Severnoy Yevropy : 59 68. Moscow: Nauka (in

TOLMACHEV A I . (1931). K metodike sravnitelno floristichesk ih issledovaniy. 1. Ponyatiye o flore v sravnitelnoy

floristike. Zhurn . Russk . Bot . ob va, 16 (1): 111 124 (in

VASILEVICH V.I . (1983). Ocherki teoretiche skoi fitotsenologii . Leningrad: Nauka, 247 p. (in

VYNOKUROV D. S. (2013). Vegetation of limestone outcr ops of the river Ingul valley. In: Advances in Botany and Ecology 2013: Proceeding of International Conference of Young Scientists, Scholkine, Ukraine, June 18 22, 2013 : 200-202. (in Ukrainian)

VYNOKUROV D S . (2014). Syntaxonomy of xero thermic vegetation of the Ingul River Vallye (class Festuco Brometea). Part 1. Petrophytic steppe vegetation. Ukr . Bot . J ., 71 (2): 142-152 . (in

WALKER L.R., DEL M ORAL R. (2003). Primary succession and ecosystem rehabilitation Cambridge Univer sity Press, 442 p.

WEBER H. E., Moravec J., Theurillat J. (2000). International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature . 3rd ed. J. Veget. Sci ., 5 739-768.

WESTHOFF V., VAN DER M AAREL E. (1973). The Braun Blanquet approach In: Handbook of vegetation scie nce. Vol. 5. Ordination and classification of communities . Hague: 617 726.

WHISENANT S.G., T HUROW T.L., M ARANZ S.G . ( Initiating Autogenic Restoration on Shallow Semiarid Sites. Restoration Ecology , 3 : 61-67.

YAROSHENKO P D . (1961). Geobotanika . Osn ovnyie pon iatiia, napravleniia i metody Moscov, Leningra d: AN SSSR, 474 p. (in Russian)

YAROSHENKO P D ( Geobotanika . Posobiie dlia studentov pedvuzov Moscow: Prosveshcheniie 200 p. (in Russian)

Published

2018-06-14

How to Cite

VYNOKUROV, D. (2018). Autogenetic changes of vegetation in the Ingul River Valley. CHORNOMORSKI BOTANICAL JOURNAL, 14(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.14255/2308-9628/18.142/1